Ticker data delayed by 20 minutes

Projects

Reserves & Resources

NEWONE2325555

CHINA MINERAL RESOURCES1,2

Please scroll ← → to view more.

 

PROJECT RESOURCE CATEGORY TONNES

(MILLION)

 AVERAGE GRADES

CONTAINED METAL RESOURCES

(INCLUSIVE OF RESERVES)
SILVER  (g/t) GOLD  (g/t) LEAD    (%) ZINC

(%)

 SILVER

(Moz)

 GOLD  (Koz) AgEq3

(Moz)

 LEAD 

(Kt)

 ZINC 

(Kt)
YING MINING DISTRICT Measured 20.94 164 0.15 2.62 0.78 110 99 119 548 162
Indicated 21.24 128 0.19 1.87 0.57 87 132 99 396 122
Measured + Indicated 42.18 146 0.17 2.24 0.67 198 231 218 944 284
Inferred 13.55 120 0.33 1.84 0.58 52 142 65 249 78
GC MINE Measured 8.97 66  - 1.01 2.44 19  - 19 91 219
Indicated 9.30 64  - 0.82 2.04 19  - 19 76 190
Measured + Indicated 18.28 65  - 0.91 2.24 38  - 38 167 408
Inferred 7.36 75  - 0.84 1.91 18  - 18 62 140
BYP MINE
(Au AREA)		 Measured 3.30  - 2.7 - -  - 294 25 - -
Indicated 1.80  - 2.8 - -  - 162 14 - -
Measured + Indicated 5.10  - 2.8 - -  - 456 39 - -
Inferred 1.60  - 2.2 - -  - 116 10 - -
BYP MINE
(Pb-Zn AREA)		 Indicated 3.80 -  - 0.6 2.3 - - - 25 87
Inferred 2.80 - - 0.7 2.5 - - - 19 71
CONSOLIDATED4  MEASURED 33.21 135 0.50 2.14 1.28 129 393 163 639 381
INDICATED 36.14 109 0.39 1.45 1.16 107 294 132 497 399
MEASURED AND INDICATED 69.36 121 0.45 1.77 1.21 236 687 295 1136 779
INFERRED 25.31 104 0.53 1.39 1.22 70 258 92 330 289
  1. Mineral Resources Estimate for Ying Mining District effective Dec 31, 2025; Mineral Resources Estimate for GC Mine effective Dec 31, 2025; Mineral Resources Estimate for BYP Mine as of June 30, 2024.
  2. Totals may not add up due to rounding.
  3. Silver equivalent (AgEq) includes gold converted to AgEq at a rate of 86.364:1.
  4. Consolidated average grades reflect those assets that produce the metal.
  5. For further details please refer to a) Ying’s National Instrument 43-101 Mineral Resource Technical Report with the effective dated of May 18, 2026, b) Silvercorp news release dated June 23, 2026, and titled Silvercorp Reports Updated Mineral Reserves and Resources at the GC Mine, and c) BYP’s National Instrument 43-101 Mineral Resource Technical Report dated June 30, 2024.

CHINA MINERAL RESERVES 1,2

Please scroll ← → to view more.

PROJECT RESERVE CATEGORY TONNES (MILLION) AVERAGE GRADES CONTAINED METAL RESOURCES
SILVER (g/t) GOLD (g/t) LEAD (%) ZINC

(%)

 SILVER (Moz) GOLD (Koz) AgEq3

(Moz)

 LEAD 

(Kt)

 ZINC

 (Kt)
YING MINING DISTRICT Proven 10.41 179 0.15 2.71 0.87 60 51 64 282 90
Probable 8.66 167 0.20 2.19 0.71 47 56 51 190 62
Proven + Probable 19.08 174 0.17 2.47 0.80 107 107 116 472 152
GC MINE Proven 3.57 59 - 0.96 2.27 7  - 7 34 81
Probable 2.62 67 - 0.84 2.17 6  - 6 22 57
Proven + Probable 6.19 63 - 0.91 2.23 12 - 12 56 138
CONSOLIDATED4 PROVEN 13.98 148 0.15 2.26 1.23 67 51 71 316 171
PROBABLE 11.28 144 0.20 1.88 1.05 52 56 57 212 119
TOTAL 25.27 146 0.17 2.09 1.15 119 107 128 528 290
    1. Mineral Reserves Estimate for Ying Mining District effective Dec 31, 2025; Mineral Reserves Estimate for GC Mine effective Dec 31, 2025.
    2. Totals may not add up due to rounding.
    3. Silver equivalent (AgEq) includes gold converted to AgEq at a rate of 86.364:1.
    4. Consolidated average grades reflect those assets that produce the metal.
    5. For further details please refer to a) Ying’s National Instrument 43-101 Mineral Resource Technical Report with the effective dated of May 18, 2026, b) Silvercorp news release dated June 23, 2026, and titled Silvercorp Reports Updated Mineral Reserves and Resources at the GC Mine

EL DOMO RESOURCE & RESERVES

Please scroll ← → to view more.

El Domo Open Pit

Category Tonnes

(Mt)

 Grade Contained Metal
Cu
(%)		 Pb
(%)		 Zn
(%)		 Au
(g/t)		 Ag
(g/t)		 Cu
(kt)		 Pb
(kt)		 Zn
(kt)		 Au
(koz)		 Ag
(koz)
Proven 2.7 2.60% 0.26% 2.63% 3.33 48 69.3 7.0 70.2 285 4,153
Probable 4.5 1.53% 0.26% 2.63% 2.08 47 68.4 11.4 117.5 299 6,807
P&P 7.1 1.93% 0.26% 2.63% 2.55 48 137.7 18.4 187.7 584 10,960
Measured 3.6 2.67% 0.3% 2.59% 3.09 47 97.3 9.0 94.2 362 5,473
Indicated 7.5 1.42% 0.2% 2.36% 1.66 40 105.5 15.8 176.2 397 9,504
M&I 11.1 1.83% 0.2% 2.44% 2.13 42 202.8 24.8 270.4 759 14,978
Inferred 3.5 0.48% 0.1% 1.00% 0.72 22 16.7 4.3 34.7 80 2,472

El Domo Underground

Category Tonnes

(Mt)

 Grade Contained Metal
Cu

(%)

 Pb

(%)

 Zn

(%)

 Au

(g/t)

 Ag

(g/t)

 Cu

(kt)

 Pb

(kt)

 Zn

(kt)

 Au

(koz)

 Ag

(koz)
Indicated 0.3 2.73% 0.12% 1.72% 1.58 31 8.8 0.4 5.5 16 321
Inferred 0.4 0.25% 0.20% 0.67% 1.53 89 0.9 0.7 2.5 18 1,051

CONDOR RESOURCE

Please scroll ← → to view more.

Condor Underground Constrained Resource

Deposit Tonnes

(Mt)

 Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq

(g/t)

 Au

(g/t)

 Ag

(g/t)

 Pb

(%)

 Zn

(%)

 AuEq

(Moz)

 Au

(Moz)

 Ag

(Moz)

 Pb

(Mlb)

 Zn

(Mlb)
Camp 5.93 2.46 1.94 15.51 0.06 0.61 0.47 0.37 3 8 80
Los Cuyes 4.22 2.07 1.84 11.06 0.05 0.36 0.28 0.25 2 4 33
Total Indicated 10.15 2.30 1.90 13.66 0.05 0.50 0.75 0.62 4 12 113
Camp 20.04 2.42 1.87 14.83 0.05 0.68 1.56 1.20 10 23 299
Los Cuyes 10.06 2.63 2.37 13.26 0.07 0.36 0.85 0.77 4 15 81
Total Inferred 30.10 2.49 2.03 14.31 0.06 0.57 2.41 1.97 14 38 380

Condor Open Pit Constrained Resource

Deposit Tonnes

(Mt)

 Average Grade Contained Metal
AuEq

(g/t)

 Au

(g/t)

 Ag

(g/t)

 Pb

(%)

 Zn

(%)

 AuEq

(Moz)

 Au

(Moz)

 Ag

(Moz)

 Pb

(Mlb)

 Zn

(Mlb)
Soledad 4.63 1.06 0.98 6.86 0.05 0.54 0.16 0.15 1.02 5 55
Enma 0.02 1.20 1.12 6.73 0.04 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.18
Total Indicated 4.65 1.06 0.98 6.86 0.05 0.54 0.16 0.15 1.03 5 56
Soledad 19.99 0.73 0.66 5.97 0.04 0.46 0.47 0.42 3.84 17 203
Enma 0.01 0.95 0.86 7.82 0.04 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03
Total Inferred 20.00 0.73 0.66 5.97 0.04 0.46 0.47 0.42 3.84 17 203

KYRGYZSTAN MINERAL RESOURCES ESTIMATE

Please scroll ← → to view more.

Tulkubash Mineral Resource Estimate in Pit Constrained

Tulkubash 2025 In-house MRE (COG Au 0.21g/t) 40/80M
Category Tonnes (Mt) Au Grade (g/t) Ag Grade (g/t) Contained Au (koz) Contained Ag (koz)
Measured 7.35 1.61 1.38 380.5 327.0
Indicated 1.28 1.99 1.45 81.7 59.6
Total M+I 8.63 1.67 1.39 462.2 386.6
  1. The effective date of the resource is October 2025.
  2. The qualified person (as defined in NI 43-101) for the purposes of the MRE is Lei Xue, P. Geo., Resource Geologist for the Company.
  3. Grade estimation completed via Inverse Distance Weight method, within block model with a parent block size of 10 m x 10 m x 10 m and minimal sub-blocking of 1m.
  4. Mineral Resources are constrained by Resource shell defined as per $1,800/oz price, applied variable recovery estimations and a cut-off grade 0.21 g/t Au.
  5. The Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not demonstrate economic viability.
  6. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

 

Kyzyltash Mineral Resource Estimate

Kyzyltash 2025 In-house MRE (COG AU 1.0g/t) 40/80m
Category Tonnes (Mt) Au Grade (g/t) Ag Grade (g/t) Contained Au (Koz) Contained Ag (Koz)
Measured 3.27 2.58 7.94 271.2 836.0
Indicated 47.04 2.43 8.96 3,670.7 13,548.8
Total M+I 50.31 2.44 8.89 3,941.9 14,384.8
Inferred 21.36 2.30 8.66 1,576.8 5,947.9
  1. The effective date of the reported Resource is October 2025.
  2. The qualified person (as defined in NI 43-101) for the purposes of the MRE is Lei Xue, P. Geo., Resource Geologist for the Company.
  3. Grade estimation completed via Inverse Distance Weight method, within block model with a parent block size of 10 m x 10 m x 10 m and minimal sub-blocking of 1m.
  4. Applied cutoff grade of 1.0 g/t Au.
  5. The Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not demonstrate economic viability.
  6. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

Last updated June 2026

Projects

  • Overview

  • Producing

    • Ying Mining District

    • GC Mine

  • Construction

    • El Domo

  • Permitting

    • BYP

  • Development

    • Condor

    • Tulkubash & Kyzyltash

  • Technical Reports

  • Reserves & Resources

  • Enterprise Blog

Subscribe For Updates